yarghv court: research on judicial court
نویسندگان
چکیده
yarghv was the exclusive mongol jurisdiction court to resolve claims and disputes in various fields and was formed in most areas of the mongol empire, including the patriarch of iran (654-750 ah). the court mostly took place for political and some economical and social crimes, in mongol military camps. in this court, some methods similar to islamic courts were used, such as testimony, forced confession by torture, and presentation of written documents; and criminals were judged based on yassa. as yarghvchy people were at the top of this court. yarghvchys, who were mostly mongolian princes and commanders, judged based on mongolian laws which rooted in yassa. dominance on yassa was the condition of becoming yarghvchy. in this paper we notice this court, its manner and trial style, via study of ilkhanid texts; and by this means throw light on history of judicial system in iran. keywords: yarghv, yarghvchy, mongols, yassa, ilkhans, court, judgment
منابع مشابه
Caste and the Court: Examining Judicial Selection Bias on Bench Assignments on the Indian Supreme Court
This paper is a study on the effect of caste on bench assignments on the Indian Supreme Court. The objective was to determine whether the Chief Justices have historically assigned associate justices to benches based on their individual castes – Brahmin or Non-Brahmin – in order to tilt the bias of the Court in either an elitist (Brahmin) direction or a non-elitist (Non-Brahmin) direction. Based...
متن کاملThe Least Activist Supreme Court in History? the Roberts Court and the Exercise of Judicial Review
Not too many years ago, scholars could reasonably speak of the U.S. Supreme Court as being among the most activist in American history. Both empirical and normative scholarship was driven by the sense of a Court that was aggressive in the assertion of its own supremacy and active in the exercise of the power of judicial review. The Court under Chief Justice John Roberts cannot be viewed in the ...
متن کاملEconomic Trends and Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory of the Court
We investigate the effect of economic conditions on the voting behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. We theorize that Justices are akin to voters in political elections; specifically, we posit that the Justices will view short-term and relatively minor economic downturns—recessions—as attributable to the failures of elected officials, but will consider long-term and extreme economic contract...
متن کاملConfirmation Bias in the United States Supreme Court Judicial Database
We ask whether the widely used direction of decision and direction of vote variables in the United States Supreme Court Judicial Database (USSCJD) are contaminated by confirmation bias, or have been affected by expectations about the likely effects of judicial preferences on case outcomes. Using a sample of generally comparable cases, we find evidence that the assignment of issue codes to these...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
تاریخ اسلام و ایرانجلد ۲۴، شماره ۲۴، صفحات ۱۳۹-۱۷۸
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023